ANALISIS PENERIMAAN APLIKASI SISTER KEMENDIKBUD DENGAN MODEL UTAUT: STUDI KASUS PENGGUNAAN G2E

Miftah Muhammad; Assaf Arief; Ahmad Fuad

doi:10.36549/ijis.v9i1.291

ANALISIS PENERIMAAN APLIKASI SISTER KEMENDIKBUD DENGAN MODEL UTAUT: STUDI KASUS PENGGUNAAN G2E

Miftah Muhammad, Assaf Arief, Ahmad Fuad

Sari

Aplikasi SISTER Kemendikbud, sebagai wujud dari penerapan e-government, bertujuan meningkatkan efisiensi, transparansi, dan layanan bagi penggunanya. Pendekatan kuantitatif melibatkan 950 pengguna aplikasi dari berbagai wilayah di Indonesia. Data diperoleh melalui survei online, memfokuskan pada variabel seperti Perceived Ease of Use (PEU), Perceived Usefulness (PU), Social Influence (SI), Facilitating Conditions (FC), dan Self-Efficacy (SE), serta dampaknya terhadap Perilaku Pengguna (PP). Hasil penelitian mengkonfirmasi pengaruh signifikan PEU, FC, dan SE terhadap PP. Penelitian juga mempertimbangkan faktor kontrol seperti jenis kelamin, usia, pendidikan, status pekerjaan, dan lokasi tempat kerja. Temuan ini memberikan wawasan berharga bagi pengembangan aplikasi (Government to Employees) G2E di masa depan dan membantu pemerintah dalam meningkatkan efektivitas serta adopsi aplikasi semacam ini oleh pengguna.

Kata Kunci: E-government, UTAUT, Sister-Kemendikbud, G2E.

Teks Lengkap:

PDF (Indonesia)

Referensi

Al Mansoori, K. A., Sarabdeen, J., & Tchantchane, A. L. (2018). Investigating Emirati citizens’ adoption of e-government services in Abu Dhabi using modified UTAUT model. Information Technology & People, 31(2), 455–481. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-12-2016-0290

Alruwaie, M., El-Haddadeh, R., & Weerakkody, V. (2020). Citizens’ continuous use of eGovernment services: The role of self-efficacy, outcome expectations and satisfaction. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101485 [1-11]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101485

Al-Shafi, S., Weerakkody, V., & Janssen, M. (2009). Investigating the Adoption of eGovernment Services in Qatar Using the UTAUT Model. In 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2009): Vol. Paper 260 (pp. 1–10). AIS. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2009/260

Arief, A., Sensuse, D. I., Latif, L. A., & Yunus Abbas, M. (2021). Study on E-Government Integration: A Theoretical and Empirical Review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1125(1), 012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1125/1/012028

Batlle-Montserrat, J., Blat, J., & Abadal, E. (2014). Benchmarking Municipal E-Government Services:: A Bottom-Up Methodology and Pilot Results. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 10(4), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijegr.2014100103

Bose, R. (2004). E-government: infrastructure and technologies for education and training. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 1(4), 349–361.

Boyer-Wright, K. M., & Kottemann, J. E. (2020). E-Government and Related Indices: Telecommunications Infrastructure, Human Capital, Institutional Efficacy, and Online Services. In M. Khosrow-Pour, S.

Clarke, M. E. Jennex, & A.-V. Anttiroiko (Eds.), Open Government: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1810–1824). IGI Global. http://www.igi-global.com/chapter/e-government-and-related-indices/235256

Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors *. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE. https://books.google.co.za/books?hl=en&lr=lang_en&id=EbogAQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=quantitative+creswell&ots=cahMpXRAF8&sig=jN66MOd3r5nCuoPAbLJry9QwdQQ#v=onepage&q=quantitative creswell&f=false

Kemendikbud RI. (2023). Panduan Sistem Informasi Sumberdaya Terintegrasi (SISTER). https://sister.kemdikbud.go.id/dokumen_panduan

Enrique, B., Achmad, N., Tulus, W., & Ulung, P. (2017). Are government employees adopting local e-government transformation?: The need for having the right attitude, facilitating conditions and performance expectations. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(4), 612–638. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-09-2017-0056 10.1108/TG-09-2017-0056

Freiheit, J., & Zangl, F. A. (2007). Model-based User-interface Management for Public Services. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 5(1), 53–62. http://www.ejeg.com/volume-5/vol5-iss1/v5-i1-art6.htm

Handayani, P. W., Hidayanto, A. N., Pinem, A. A., Sandhyaduhita, P. I., & Budi, I. (2018). Hospital information system user acceptance factors: User group perspectives. Informatics for Health & Social Care, 43(1), 84–107. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lxh&AN=127643347&site=ehost-live

Heeks, R. (1999). Reinventing Government in the Information Age. International Practice in IT-Enabled Public Sector Reform. Routledge.

Heeks, R. (2002). Failure, Success and Improvisation of Information Systems Projects in Developing Countries. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3477762

Heeks, R. (2005). e-Government as a Carrier of Context. Journal of Public Policy, 25, 51–74. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=939775901&Fmt=7&clientId=8991&RQT=309&VName=PQD

Hsiao, C.-H., Wang, H.-C., & Doong, H.-S. (2012). A Study of Factors Influencing e-Government Service Acceptance Intention: A Multiple Perspective Approach. In A. Kő, C. Leitner, H. Leitold, & A. Prosser (Eds.), Advancing Democracy, Government and Governance: Proceedings of the Joint International Conference on Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective, and Electronic Democracy (EGOVIS/EDEM 2012) (Vol. 7452, pp. 79–87). http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-32701-8_8

Hussein, R., Mohamed, N., Ahlan, A. R., Mahmud, M., & Aditiawarman, U. (n.d.). G2C Adoption of E-Government in Malaysia: Trust, Perceived Risk and Political Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 6(3), 57–72.

Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2015). Site Effects: How Reliance on Social Media Influences Confidence in the Government and News Media. Social Science Computer Review, 33(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/Doi 10.1177/0894439314537029

Leitner, C. (2006). e-Government: People and Skills in Europe’s Administrations. In Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-39) (pp. 77b (1-9)). Computer Societry Press. http://csdl2.computer.org/persagen/DLAbsToc.jsp?resourcePath=/dl/proceedings/hicss/&toc=comp/proceedings/hicss/2006/2507/04/25074toc.xml&DOI=10.1109/HICSS.2006.136

Loo, W. H., Yeow, P. H. P., & Chong, S. C. (2009). User acceptance of Malaysian government multipurpose smartcard applications . Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.07.004

Naranjo-Zolotov, M., Oliveira, T., & Casteleyn, S. (2019). Citizens’ intention to use and recommend e-participation Drawing upon UTAUT and citizen empowerment. Information Technology & People, 32(2), 364–386. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-08-2017-0257

INPRES NO. 3, 1 (2003).

Pritchard, T., Galvez, S., Guzman, I., & Deng, X. (2019). Government employees and their use of Digital Government. In 25th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2019) (p. [1-10]).

Association for Information Systems. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2019/digital_government/digital_government/11

Rehouma, M. Ben, & Hofmann, S. (2018). Government Employees’ Adoption of Information Technology: A Literature Review. In 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2018) (p. [1-10]). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209311

Sebetci, Ö. (2015). A TAM-based model for e-government: a case for Turkey. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 7(2), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2015.069503

Sounders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research Methods for Business Students. In PEARSON (Vol. 7, Issue September).

Susanto, T. D., & Goodwin, R. (2011). User Acceptance of SMS-Based eGovernment Services. In M. Janssen, H. J. Scholl, M. A. Wimmer, & Y. Tan (Eds.), Electronic Government: Proceedings of the 10th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2011 (Vol. 6846, pp. 75–87). http://www.springerlink.com.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/content/r777101802276537/

Tsap, V., Pappel, I., & Draheim, D. (2019). Factors Affecting e-ID Public Acceptance: A Literature Review. In A. Kő, E. Francesconi, G. Anderst-Kotsis, A. M. Tjoa, & I. Khalil (Eds.), 8th International Conference of Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective (EGOVIS 2019) (pp. 176–188). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27523-5_13

Wihlborg, E. (2014). Legitimate e-Government– Public e-Services as a Facilitator of Political Legitimacy. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-47) (p. 10).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36549/ijis.v9i1.291